Recently I fell in love with film again. Digital had been looking so appealing... 'It's just so EASY,' I had been thinking. On-the-fly ISO adjustment; no trade off between light sensitivity and graininess; a huge initial cost, yes, but no constant drain of funds for film and develop/print costs--$10 here, $15 there... again and again and again. That and, while the digital photos from my friends looked consistently great, my own seemed to be deteriorating.
What is with these colors?
What the hell happened there?! Oh, I guess that film was expired...
Overexposed... underexposed... overexposed again...
Well would you look at that, my SLR's got light leaks!
Two weeks ago I was back at my favorite camera/film processing store. The older gentleman who's always dressy in a shirt and tie and who has the nice but somewhat intense gaze was answering my question about the price differences between getting my images back as prints or on a CD. At the end of his spiel he added, "But if you're making the effort to shoot film you should go for prints."
The comment didn't sink in immediately and I opted for the CD, though continuing to lazily think over it while we discussed other things. I ended up changing my mind at the last minute and asking for prints.
Last weekend* I came back in and got the prints back. And there was something wonderfully nice, and missed, about holding prints in my hands and being able to flip through them. And on top of that the looked GOOD; they looked good despite the light leaks and the graininess and the slight over- and under-exposures. Film has this ability to freeze a moment in time that I don't experience with digital photographs. Go look at some old prints from the 70s and 80s and you'll see what I mean (maybe). Anyway, here are some of the photos from those rolls. Unfortunately I'm not too familiar with the print scanners at the university so I ended up settling for what they gave me, but I wish I could show you the prints themselves because they are beautiful.
*This post was actually from the summer of 2011 but I didn't have the photos all scanned in and done until now. I've since calmed down in regards to the dilemma I was having then; I've come to terms with my my simultaneous love of film and recognition of the various perks of digital. I will continue to shoot film. I may get a DSLR sometime in the future (the distant future, when I am rolling in riches enough that I have worked my way through the higher-priority items on my want list and finally make it down to a DSLR), but most of the areas I want to expand into as a photographer are still in the analog realm.